Halibut is restocked!!! Coho is sold out and will be restocked this fall along with some new products!!!

Wild Salmon vs. Farmed Salmon. Do You Know The Difference?

Adam Kohne | 17 January, 2022


          
            Wild Salmon vs. Farmed Salmon. Do You Know The Difference?

Every journey to the grocery shop is fraught with perplexities. Which type of bread do you buy?

Is it true that the birds that laid these eggs were not kept in cages?

One of the most challenging decisions is made at the seafood counter.

You're probably aware that fish like wild salmon has several health advantages and are high in the omega-3 fatty acids, which your body cannot produce on its own.

They can only be obtained from your food, and the American Heart Association suggests that we consume two servings of fish every week (a total of 6 to 8 ounces).

However, you've also heard concerning reports regarding toxins and dangers.

What should a shopper do?

Here is the nutritional breakdown of some popular fish options.

Consumers have benefited from years of study and teaching resources, yet the dispute continues.

Farmed fish has grown more widespread as the world's fish populations have depleted — but our appetite for good fish has not.

Do you trade the drawbacks of farmed fish (contaminants and health impacts) for the benefits (supply of omega-3 fatty acids, affordability, availability, and, according to some, more fabulous taste)?

Use this extensive comparison of the health advantages and hazards of farmed salmon vs. wild salmon to help you decide.

Nutritional value

According to USDA statistics, there are some significant nutritional variations between wild and farmed salmon. A tiny fillet of wild salmon contains 131 fewer calories and half the fat content of farmed salmon.

And, while farmed salmon contains slightly higher omega-3 fatty acids, it also has 20.5 percent more saturated fat – the fat you don't want.

The overall finding is that wild salmon has fewer calories and less saturated fat than farmed salmon.

Risky Pollutants

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) appear to be hazardous. They certainly are. POPs have been associated with a variety of illnesses, including type 2 diabetes and obesity. Obesity may be an even more significant risk factor for diabetes when POPs are present in your body, according to research. In addition, certain forms of POPs enhance the risk of stroke in women.

What is the significance of this?

Because PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl, a kind of POP) levels in farmed fish are five to ten times greater than in wild fish.

The overall line is that wild salmon wins hands out.

Carcinogenic compounds

This is a complex problem in the wild vs. cultivated discussion.

Although both provide omega-3 fatty acids, overeating any type of fish to reap the full advantages may expose you to cancer-causing toxins.

These compounds are derived from the possibly dirty water in which fish swim. That's why your omega-3 sources should be diverse, with fish being just one piece of the puzzle.

However, one of the research concludes that "the benefit-risk ratio for carcinogens and noncarcinogens for wild Alaskan salmon is substantially larger than for farmed Atlantic salmon."

The final line is that both wild and farmed salmon pose a risk if consumed in significant numbers. However, when consumed in moderation, most studies find that wild salmon is safer.

Contaminants that are hazardous

Contaminants in farmed salmon were shown to be greater than in wild salmon in recent research.

Contaminants were below the permitted U.S. Food and Drug Administration tolerance criteria, but they still surpassed the Environmental Protection Agency's acceptable "for regular intake" threshold.

Similarly, additional evidence shows that youngsters, women of childbearing age, and pregnant women should eat wild salmon — or other omega-3 fatty acid sources.

The main fact is that both wild and farmed salmon contain pollutants, although wild salmon has lower amounts and is generally regarded safer.

Antibiotics cause concern

This was a hot topic in the late 1990s and early 2000s when Chilean salmon shipments to Japan had greater levels of antibiotics than allowed by rules.

The fear is that overuse of antibiotics may result in resistance to their effects. Antibiotic use in farmed fish is claimed to have decreased, but it's unclear how much is still being used.

The simple line is that farmed salmon is tainted by the use of antibiotics. Wild salmon, however, does not.

Both farmed and wild salmon include nutrients that we all require. However, it is becoming obvious that the dangers connected with farmed salmon outweigh those associated with wild salmon.

You should consume wild salmon if you want to get the various health benefits that it provides.